Remove deprecated function transformBox

This commit is contained in:
Caleb Butler 2023-09-03 19:22:37 -04:00 committed by sfan5
parent 00dd1f8ef3
commit af20d9ff86
1 changed files with 13 additions and 36 deletions

View File

@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ namespace core
CMatrix4<T> operator*(const CMatrix4<T>& other) const;
//! Multiply by another matrix.
/** Like calling: (*this) = (*this) * other
/** Like calling: (*this) = (*this) * other
*/
CMatrix4<T>& operator*=(const CMatrix4<T>& other);
@ -190,10 +190,10 @@ namespace core
//! Get the rotation, as set by setRotation() when you already know the scale used to create the matrix
/** NOTE: The scale needs to be the correct one used to create this matrix.
You can _not_ use the result of getScale(), but have to save your scale
You can _not_ use the result of getScale(), but have to save your scale
variable in another place (like ISceneNode does).
NOTE: No scale value can be 0 or the result is undefined.
NOTE: It does not necessarily return the *same* Euler angles as those set by setRotationDegrees(),
NOTE: It does not necessarily return the *same* Euler angles as those set by setRotationDegrees(),
but the rotation will be equivalent, i.e. will have the same result when used to rotate a vector or node.
NOTE: It will (usually) give wrong results when further transformations have been added in the matrix (like shear).
WARNING: There have been troubles with this function over the years and we may still have missed some corner cases.
@ -203,9 +203,9 @@ namespace core
//! Returns the rotation, as set by setRotation().
/** NOTE: You will have the same end-rotation as used in setRotation, but it might not use the same axis values.
NOTE: This only works correct if no other matrix operations have been done on the inner 3x3 matrix besides
NOTE: This only works correct if no other matrix operations have been done on the inner 3x3 matrix besides
setting rotation (so no scale/shear). Thought it (probably) works as long as scale doesn't flip handedness.
NOTE: It does not necessarily return the *same* Euler angles as those set by setRotationDegrees(),
NOTE: It does not necessarily return the *same* Euler angles as those set by setRotationDegrees(),
but the rotation will be equivalent, i.e. will have the same result when used to rotate a vector or node.
*/
core::vector3d<T> getRotationDegrees() const;
@ -278,13 +278,6 @@ namespace core
void transformPlane( const core::plane3d<f32> &in, core::plane3d<f32> &out) const;
//! Transforms a axis aligned bounding box
/** The result box of this operation may not be accurate at all. For
correct results, use transformBoxEx() */
void transformBox(core::aabbox3d<f32>& box) const;
//! Transforms a axis aligned bounding box
/** The result box of this operation should be accurate, but this operation
is slower than transformBox(). */
void transformBoxEx(core::aabbox3d<f32>& box) const;
//! Multiplies this matrix by a 1x4 matrix
@ -906,8 +899,8 @@ namespace core
//! Returns a rotation which (mostly) works in combination with the given scale
/**
This code was originally written by by Chev (assuming no scaling back then,
/**
This code was originally written by by Chev (assuming no scaling back then,
we can be blamed for all problems added by regarding scale)
*/
template <class T>
@ -953,17 +946,17 @@ namespace core
template <class T>
inline core::vector3d<T> CMatrix4<T>::getRotationDegrees() const
{
// Note: Using getScale() here make it look like it could do matrix decomposition.
// It can't! It works (or should work) as long as rotation doesn't flip the handedness
// aka scale swapping 1 or 3 axes. (I think we could catch that as well by comparing
// Note: Using getScale() here make it look like it could do matrix decomposition.
// It can't! It works (or should work) as long as rotation doesn't flip the handedness
// aka scale swapping 1 or 3 axes. (I think we could catch that as well by comparing
// crossproduct of first 2 axes to direction of third axis, but TODO)
// And maybe it should also offer the solution for the simple calculation
// And maybe it should also offer the solution for the simple calculation
// without regarding scaling as Irrlicht did before 1.7
core::vector3d<T> scale(getScale());
// We assume the matrix uses rotations instead of negative scaling 2 axes.
// Otherwise it fails even for some simple cases, like rotating around
// 2 axes by 180° which getScale thinks is a negative scaling.
// Otherwise it fails even for some simple cases, like rotating around
// 2 axes by 180° which getScale thinks is a negative scaling.
if (scale.Y<0 && scale.Z<0)
{
scale.Y =-scale.Y;
@ -1278,22 +1271,6 @@ namespace core
transformPlane( out );
}
//! Transforms the edge-points of a bounding box
//! Deprecated as it's usually not what people need (regards only 2 corners, but other corners might be outside the box after transformation)
//! Use transformBoxEx instead.
template <class T>
_IRR_DEPRECATED_ inline void CMatrix4<T>::transformBox(core::aabbox3d<f32>& box) const
{
#if defined ( USE_MATRIX_TEST )
if (isIdentity())
return;
#endif
transformVect(box.MinEdge);
transformVect(box.MaxEdge);
box.repair();
}
//! Transforms a axis aligned bounding box more accurately than transformBox()
template <class T>
inline void CMatrix4<T>::transformBoxEx(core::aabbox3d<f32>& box) const